Five disciplines. One federal standard.
From fraud investigation to regulatory advisory, each engagement draws on direct federal law enforcement and oversight experience—not frameworks borrowed from outside the room.
Capabilities matched to your exposure
Cairo conducts fraud investigations under federal investigative standards—document examination, financial reconstruction, and witness development used in actual prosecutions. Findings are structured for regulatory submission, board presentation, and, when required, referral to law enforcement.
Forensic inquiry built for evidence
We design compliance programs around the questions examiners actually ask on-site, not the checklists that satisfy auditors in quiet periods. Program architecture, control testing, and gap remediation are scoped to your specific regulatory exposure and operational reality.
Designed for what regulators examine
Fraud risk assessments identify the vulnerabilities examiners find after an event—before they do. Cairo maps control failures across transactions, personnel access, and oversight structures, then delivers a prioritized remediation plan tied to operational workflow, not theoretical risk matrices.
Control gaps before the event
Governance reviews examine how decisions are actually made and documented, not how the org chart says they should be. Cairo audits committee mandates, escalation pathways, and oversight records—then recommends structural changes that survive regulatory scrutiny and board challenge.
Accountability structures that hold
Cairo advises boards and executive teams navigating active regulatory inquiries, enforcement actions, and consent order remediation. Counsel is grounded in firsthand knowledge of how agencies conduct examinations, prioritize findings, and measure institutional response—not external interpretation of published guidance.
Counsel from inside the process
From intake to delivered findings
Situation briefing
Ground-level investigation
Board-ready findings
A confidential intake call establishes the facts on the ground—regulatory status, known exposure, internal findings to date, and the board's immediate decision horizon.
Documents, data, and personnel access are reviewed using federal investigative methodology. Nothing is taken at face value; every control gap is tested against operational reality.
Findings are structured for executive presentation and regulatory submission—prioritized, defensible, and actionable. No filler. No caveats that obscure the core issue.
Ready to brief us on your situation?
Engagements begin with a confidential call. Tell us what you are facing and we will tell you whether Cairo is the right fit.